Mitsubishi RVR

Why can't you import Mark II Blit's over there? I've seen two here and they are AWESOME
 
Why can't you import Mark II Blit's over there? I've seen two here and they are AWESOME

Because we had a Liberal government for about 13 years and they wrecked everything. :crying:

The turbo versions would probably be eligible on the power-weight criterion, but under the laws brought in by the then Liberal government about 4 years ago it is now very difficult and expensive to get compliance approval for new models. It'll only happen if someone thinks there's a significant market here.
 
You can get the current shape (up to around 2006-7-ish) in a wagon but it will be FWD.

Being a 1.8 litre NA Corolla, it will be cheap as piss to run.
 
You can get the current shape (up to around 2006-7-ish) in a wagon but it will be FWD.

Being a 1.8 litre NA Corolla, it will be cheap as piss to run.

Hehe I had company Corollas for 8.5 years so excuse me if I say I will pass on that. :cautious:
I'm looking at some 1st gen Outbacks too. Libery wagons, 7G Galant hatches etc .... some others I'm not game to list on here :rolleyes:
 
Can anyone confirm for me the auto gearboxes for the RVR ?

I'm seeing manual ones listed with 3sp boxes ... surely they would be 4sp auto & 5sp manual ?
 
My run-about is the girl's 1990's Suzuki Vitara. Still in great nick, getting the roof and bonnet re-sprayed, towbar fitted (mountain bikes). A surprisingly capable 4WD because of its lightweight and torquey 4cyl motor. At 100km/h freeway speeds, it's foot-to-the-floor, breath-of-wind-slows-it-down territory though.
 
The RVRs are reminding me of a jacked up Nimbus.

I wonder if they share parts at all.
 
Mazda 626 awesome car, great on fuel
 
Yes but have heard horrible stories about their auto boxes. They use Ford transmissions.
?

Which model?

All of the 80's and 90's 626's were all mazda! , ford used their parts.

Ie 626 / telstar - same car , all mazda besides badges.
 
I found this from Wikipedia ;

Mazda's 2.5L V6 engine (enlarged from the 1.8L V6 on the 1992 MX-3) debuted to rave reviews. Though the manual transmission was highly regarded, 4-cylinder 626s from 1994 onwards used Ford's CD4E automatic transmission, which quickly became known for its extremely high failure rate. All 626 automatic transmissions, meanwhile, continued the previous generation 626's habits of ill-timed shifts and indecisive kickdowns.
 
Top Bottom