0-320 km/h in 20 sec!!

[Madhav]

Those crazy yanks, bigger and better....

Link to the article here

 

[Guest]

bugatti is still better.lol

 

[SupremeMoFo]

bugatti is still better.lol

Agree.

 

[Dr_Josh001]

I bet the Bugatti would kick its but around a track; those yanks wouldn't know good suspension if it hit them in the face!

 

[Madhav]

I heard the venom is seriously difficult to drive also, i.e. wheels spinning in forth gear, so you are probably right Josh... but you gotto admit that kinda power is pretty damn impressive.

 

[Guest]

Id still take a Viper anyday over the Bugatti. As its only a fraction of the price.

Bugatti is over priced!

 

[Guest]

i disagree the bugatti is built for speed and high speed cornering..
josh is rite when he said yanks dont know suspention, they also dont know brakes..
they relesed a new camaro or something like that with 500hp and it was way over priced but sill had leaf and spring set up.. who builds a car with a heap of HP and puts leaf and spring?? thats dumb imo

 

[SiliconAngel]

Bugatti is over priced!

Actually it's underpriced. You might argue that makes it overengineered, but considering Bugatti sell them at a loss (and quite a substantial one) you can hardly say they're overpriced.

But they are ludicrously expensive.

 

[RaZZa137]

one question......why didn't they make the viper 4wd, at least it would have a better chance at traction

 

[matchtheclown]

We all know Americans have so little idea about car's it's phenomenal.

Well the gt40 wasn't bad

The Viper would be loads cheaper.. but not pleasant to drive.

 

[Madhav]

one question......why didn't they make the viper 4wd, at least it would have a better chance at traction

Now that would be a car...

 

[Guest]

i agree bout the GT40, i was watching a doco on the gt40 and it muched a ferrari enzo

 

[Dr_Josh001]

i disagree the bugatti is built for speed and high speed cornering..
josh is rite when he said yanks dont know suspention, they also dont know brakes..
they relesed a new camaro or something like that with 500hp and it was way over priced but sill had leaf and spring set up.. who builds a car with a heap of HP and puts leaf and spring?? thats dumb imo

Also on the "Clarkson" DVD there was a new 500hp Mustang which also had leaf springs!!?? That makes sense as much as their health system... no wait they don't have one!

Actually it's underpriced. You might argue that makes it overengineered, but considering Bugatti sell them at a loss (and quite a substantial one) you can hardly say they're overpriced.

But they are ludicrously expensive.

They also built them so they could set the new record of the fastest production supercar so profit was no objective.

 

[Dr_Josh001]

i agree bout the GT40, i was watching a doco on the gt40 and it muched a ferrari enzo

Beat it 3 years in a row in the 60's in Le Mans. Go Ford!

 

[SiliconAngel]

Beat it 3 years in a row in the 60's in Le Mans. Go Ford!

Not an Enzo it didn't...

 

[Dr_Josh001]

Not an Enzo it didn't...

I dunno; our own Jack Brabham was pretty untouchable.

Be interesting to compare the lap times from back then to what an Enzo could do now.

 

[Guest]

no im sure i saw a doco on the GT40 and a enzo, and the GT40 came out on top but just..
not a massive fan of american cars or holdens and that kinda crap as i think they are just over priced buckets of shit.. could be wrong but thats my take on them, i used to love holdens then got my forester and just started seeing that jap and european cars are just built better and thought out better..

 

[timmae2006]

AWD Viper......YES bring it on