Why pod filters are crap and why you shouldn't run one, and some cool diag stuff too!

G

Guest

Unregistered
Found this somewhat amusing, all that technology, and yet it wasn't needed, interesting enough though
 

bradc

1 AYC Bar
Location
New Zealand
First Name
Brad
Drive
Facelift Manual 400hp VR-4 Legnum
That is awesome :)

That would have been picked up via EVO scan as well and been fairly easy to see. I'm also going to change the thread title to make it easier to find.

Just another reason why pods are shit. Poorly made ones can break like that one, and well made ones just make you lose power and use more fuel.
 
G

Guest

Unregistered
wow interesting,lookslike a redline filter or somehting lol
 

Peter_D

Leaving Skid Marks
Location
QLD
First Name
Pete
Drive
Cab Colt & Evo 6
The moral of the story is if your using a POD filter smooth out the airflow before it impacts on the sensor and don't be bloody lazy clean your filters regularly. You never know what crap you'll find caught up in them.
 

BuzzPuppy

OZVR4 Ambassador
Lifetime Member
Location
Victoria
First Name
Gavin
Drive
レグナム Super VR-4
For these particular cars. Nice find there Sean, definite rep points your way.

Whose car was it?
 

Tom

Leaving Skid Marks
Location
NSW
First Name
Tom
Drive
New: 2006 BMW 335i M-Sport | Old: 2000 Galant VR4, MY04 STI WRX, 2009 Audi A4 2.7tdi
Haha yeah I went back to my stock box after being told numerous times how bad pods were :p
 

steveP

1 AYC Bar
Location
SA
First Name
Steve
Drive
VR4 Galant
i just read the whole article; and let me get this right..

some guy had a cheap, generic and BROKEN pod filter on his already problem-riden vr4, which we all know have very tempremental air flow metres, and now ALL pod filters on ALL cars regardless of quality and design, fall under the 'crap' umbrella.

riiiiiight!
 

Goku

Hesitantly Boosting
Location
New Zealand
First Name
Kayne
Drive
1994 Galant VR-4
2000 Legnum VR-4
Pods are only bad if they are installed directly into the engine bay with no cold air box sealing them from the heat.
They are a perfectly good mod otherwise.
 

godzilla

1 AYC Bar
Location
QLD / Tweed Coast
First Name
Trevor
Drive
1/19 2002 FL Legnum Type 'S' Manual in Black with Suede Recaro's!
Kayne, only if the air has time to "straighten" up before it hits the MAF. Its not just the heat that causes probs with Pods on a VR4 it's also the turbulence they cause.
 

steveP

1 AYC Bar
Location
SA
First Name
Steve
Drive
VR4 Galant
if u want a pod on ur vr4 or mitsubishi for that matter, just get a K&N rampod which complies with our air flow metre. i got one and the car has been running flawlessly for 6 months with it.

the major pro/con of a pod is air flow and heat. the pod will allow more air to flow, but just take precautions to sheild it from the engine bay heat.
 

Tom

Leaving Skid Marks
Location
NSW
First Name
Tom
Drive
New: 2006 BMW 335i M-Sport | Old: 2000 Galant VR4, MY04 STI WRX, 2009 Audi A4 2.7tdi
If Pods were really THAT crappy of a mod, they wouldn't be so widely used in a lot of circumstances.. Just, they're not the best mod for OUR cars..

Unless, like Steve said, you get one that properly complies with our cars and they're shielded..

So I guess what's been said in here/title is being intended for VR4s and not just in general
 
G

Guest

Unregistered
This thread begs the question. At what point does the stock airbox with a good panel filter not flow enough?
 

godzilla

1 AYC Bar
Location
QLD / Tweed Coast
First Name
Trevor
Drive
1/19 2002 FL Legnum Type 'S' Manual in Black with Suede Recaro's!
This thread begs the question. At what point does the stock airbox with a good panel filter not flow enough?

Most of us wont ever have to worry about that. The stock airbox with a good quality panel should do us to the stage we look for larger turbo's.
 

Tom

Leaving Skid Marks
Location
NSW
First Name
Tom
Drive
New: 2006 BMW 335i M-Sport | Old: 2000 Galant VR4, MY04 STI WRX, 2009 Audi A4 2.7tdi
After that then something like the ARC Airbox with a nice flow would be a good addition?

Like in Chris's (um318r)
DSC_0527.jpg
 
G

Guest

Unregistered
Trevor: That's what I thought...

Tom: Unless that hat some sort of CAI (I think he does) and decent insulation from the enginebay heat (not so much) then it's still going to be sucking in hot air...
 

steveP

1 AYC Bar
Location
SA
First Name
Steve
Drive
VR4 Galant
honestly i would rather ditch the air flow metre all together and run an aftermarket computer. then u run a pod of each turbo and shield them in a custom box like shown.
 

Tom

Leaving Skid Marks
Location
NSW
First Name
Tom
Drive
New: 2006 BMW 335i M-Sport | Old: 2000 Galant VR4, MY04 STI WRX, 2009 Audi A4 2.7tdi
Tom: Unless that hat some sort of CAI (I think he does) and decent insulation from the enginebay heat (not so much) then it's still going to be sucking in hot air...

Yeah he does have one, that pic is older but last time I saw his car he had one :cool:
 

Peter_D

Leaving Skid Marks
Location
QLD
First Name
Pete
Drive
Cab Colt & Evo 6
Hang on guys. Pod filters are OK you just have to pick your application. The K&N OVAL filter designed for the Mitsu air flow sensors are also OK for the Legnum/Galant VR4 range of cars. I don't know how they would go on say a R32.

As I pointed out in my earlier post and this information can be verified by searching the forum as this has been covered before, you can use a GOOD quality low interference pod filter on your VR4. BUT the air impacting on the air flow sensor MUST be evened out and must not be swirling around. The best way to do so is to move the pod away from the sensor by using extension bit. I have even seen someone use some PVC pipe. What ever you use must be around (I think) 8 inches in length and be able to withstand substantial air vacuum pressure. Don't use a coke can, yes I have seen it before, as it will implode due to the vacuum. That guy ended up using a fruit tin and it worked. Although the gaffer tape looked pretty shitty.
 

BuzzPuppy

OZVR4 Ambassador
Lifetime Member
Location
Victoria
First Name
Gavin
Drive
レグナム Super VR-4
Vaguely, I remember seeing a formula relating airflow (cm^3), diameter of pipe and ideal inlet pipe length for the airflow to smooth out. That distance meant that the battery had to be relocated.

Was it on CVR4 somewhere? (goes searching)
 
Top Bottom