- Location
- NSW
- First Name
- Steve
- Drive
- 2010 nt did pajero tow car / 2000 6spd gc8 wrx tarmac rally car / 2000 Manual Subaru Outback 2.5 just a car
- Thread starter
- #41
Nah it'll be right, worst case is 55% more fuel and that's running as rich as 98 and no timing benefit (so there will be less fuel than that used) but that was using googled calorific values and a 5 minute calc while I was eating breakfast so that might not be quite correct either. The volvo thread above has a different calorific value per litre to what I saw but that only helps.
There are plenty of cars running 98 on the road and E85 on the track so unless you're going for crazy power I don't think it will be too bad....
besides, a fuel system is a lot cheaper and easier to fit than a turbo upgrade and maybe needs to be done anyway.... hmmm, excuse for a surge tank....
I know some other guys with a heap of E85 experience so I'll be talking to them first anyway, they talk only 25%-30% more fuel flow so....
Anyway it's early days and I have to do a few more things first anyway so plenty of time to research and so on.
There are plenty of cars running 98 on the road and E85 on the track so unless you're going for crazy power I don't think it will be too bad....
besides, a fuel system is a lot cheaper and easier to fit than a turbo upgrade and maybe needs to be done anyway.... hmmm, excuse for a surge tank....
I know some other guys with a heap of E85 experience so I'll be talking to them first anyway, they talk only 25%-30% more fuel flow so....
Anyway it's early days and I have to do a few more things first anyway so plenty of time to research and so on.